there are a lot of things about this picture that concern me. first and foremost, a toilet that has gained sentience is troubling. is it okay with its lot in life? do toilet genetics give it an affinity to human excrement?
if we’re giving human features to a toilet then yeah it makes sense that the mouth is in the toilet bowl with the seat being the jaw. in this way the toilet always has its mouth cavity open to the world. is that comfortable? not to mention the tongue that it also apparently has. where does the tongue sit inside the bowl? it would also hurt like hell if someone sat on the seat with its tongue placed like it is. why does it have teeth? at no point in regular toilet use is it required to mush up things in between the seat and the bowl.
the hands tho. these sharp porcelain claws. any sort of arm is concealed in this picture. if the toilet is unsatisfied with your performance will it assert itself with these hands? if the toilet gets clogged can it brandish the plunger to reestablish flow? when the toilet is clogged can it breathe? can the toilet flush itself?
does the toilet have eyelids? porcelain doesn’t compress like eyelid skin does. i don’t know what’s more troubling, the toilet having eyelids made of some stretchy material, or the toilet having lidless eyes wreathed in porcelain, ever watchful and unresting.
the bolts holding it down are coming loose. does the toilet have locomotion? presumably no because of the piping that gives it functionality. if it does wrest itself free is it doomed to die? do toilets require water to live? what about excrement, does that give them sustenance?
does this toilet have the power of speech? can they converse with man? was this message made by a man who saw the toilet’s plight? by a toilet who happened to have the materials required to make it placed within its reach?
also i did hike through a lot of sierra nevada by now i guess i can write about that too
flushing handle eyebrow. the one troubling thing i did not touch on.
man i dunno 